Farmer jailed in Hong Kong for burning flag

A man has been jailed in Hong Kong for burning the national flag, in the first sentence of its kind.

S Korea suspends savings banks citing weak finances

South Korea has suspended seven local savings banks citing the weak state of their finances.

Japan urges mass evacuation ahead of Typhoon Roke

More than a million people in central and western Japan have been urged to leave their homes as a powerful typhoon approaches.

Burma begins swap scheme for cars over 40 years old

Owners of some of Burma's most antiquated cars have been queuing in Rangoon to exchange their old vehicles for permits to import newer models.

Polio strain spreads to China from Pakistan

Polio has spread to China for the first time since 1999 after being imported from Pakistan, the World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed.

Showing posts with label Study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Study. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Children of gay families more likely to be poor: study

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
By Lauren Keiper

BOSTON | Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:32pm EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - Children growing up in lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender families are more likely to live in poverty and may be denied legal ties to one of their parents, a report released on Tuesday showed.

A lack of federal recognition of same-sex marriages means such families face higher tax burdens and unequal access to health insurance and government safety net programs, said the report entitled "All Children Matter: How Legal and Social Inequalities Hurt LGBT Families."

The report was released online and authored by groups advocating for gay rights including Movement Advancement Project, Family Equality Council and Center for American Progress.

"The reality is if you look at today's modern families, they come in all shapes and sizes," said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Equality Council.

"The laws and policies we have in place haven't kept pace with that changing reality," she said.

An estimated two million children are being raised in such households, the report said. They live in 96 percent of U.S. counties in racially and ethnically diverse families, it said.

Their children are as happy, healthy and well-adjusted as their peers raised by heterosexual parents, it said.

But such families are more likely to live in poverty than married heterosexual households, the report said.

In 31 states, it is very challenging for same-sex parents to establish legal ties for their children to both parents, Chrisler said. Thus a child could be left vulnerable if a parent dies or the relationship dissolves.

For example, Naz Meftah and Lydia Banuelos were legally married in California and are parents to three young children.

Banuelos is not recognized legally as their parent, cannot sign medical releases for them at the doctor and is not listed on their birth certificates.

The couple participated in the release of the report.

"It's not just sentimental and heart breaking. It has a real impact," Meftah told Reuters. "We are legally married and Lydia is a stranger to her own kids by law."

Tax implications and medical expenses are just a few of the problems Meftah and Banuelos have dealt with in Arizona, where the children were born, and in California.

The couple is now working through the court system in an effort for Banuelos to adopt the children.

The report detailed more than 100 state and federal policy recommendations, including ensuring access to health insurance and care, educating doctors and schools about gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender families and revising medical decision-making laws.

It also highlighted legalization and federal recognition of same-sex marriage as an important step to protecting children raised in those homes.

Maggie Gallagher, a co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage, which opposes legalization of same-sex marriage, said a change in the federal marriage law would not better protect children.

Marriage between a man and woman best protects children by having a mother and father in the same family, she said.

(Reporting by Lauren Keiper; Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Greg McCune)



New Automobile



Education Information

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Study: TV Morning News 'Dissing' GOP Candidates

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

 A new study by a conservative media watchdog group finds that the big three TV network's morning shows are far more biased against the current GOP presidential field than they were to Democrats running in the 2008 election. What's more, the Republicans challenging President Obama are facing caustic questions and getting less airtime than Democrats did four years ago.

[Vote: Who is your pick for the GOP nomination?]

The key points from the Media Research Center's review of 53 weekday morning news interviews from January 1 to September 15:

By a 5-to-1 margin, ABC, CBS, and NBC morning show hosts employed an adversarial liberal agenda when questioning this year's Republican candidates.Four years ago, Democratic candidates faced questions that tilted more than two-to-one to the left, a far friendlier agenda for liberal politicians.In 2007, Democratic candidates were frequently tossed softball questions. This year's interviews with Republicans have been much more caustic, with few chances for the candidates to project a warm and fuzzy image.Four years ago, top Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Edwards were given massive donations of airtime by ABC in the form of "town hall" meetings on Good Morning America. None of this year's Republican contenders have been given a similar opportunity.

The study is due out tomorrow and was provided in advance to Whispers, It was written by Rich Noyes and Geoff Dickens of the Media Research Center which charts alleged bias of major TV networks. [See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 GOP hopefuls.]

The study was conducted to see if the GOP presidential candidates were getting their fair share of airtime, media attention, and balanced questions. What the two found was something of a double standard when it came to how the network morning shows covered Democrats and Republicans.

On air time, for example, the GOP candidates are behind in total minutes than the 2008 crop of Democrats at this time. Rep. Michele Bachmann leads with 71 minutes followed by Tim Pawlenty at 42 minutes, Donald Trump at 39 minutes, Jon Huntsman at 26 minutes, and Mitt Romney at 21 minutes.

Also, the spouses and top aides of Democratic candidates got lots of airtime and feature stories during the last election. For the same period this election, said the center, "none of the Republican candidates' spouses or surrogates has appeared without the candidate, although Romney's wife, Ann, was included alongside her husband in NBC's May 31 profile, and ABC spoke to both Ron Paul and his son, Senator Rand Paul, on January 5."

[Check out a slide show of 10 media commentators the left and right love to hate.]

When it comes to questions, the group found a huge bias. They counted 98 ideological questions, with 81, or 83 percent, from a liberal policy bent, to the GOP field. "Thus, instead of functioning as a surrogate for the Republican rank-and-file voter who probably won't get a chance to question a candidate, TV journalists used their time with the candidates to push a standard liberal agenda," said the study.

And to compare the last election and this one, 68 percent of the questions to Democrats in the period Jan. 1 to Sept. 15, 2007 had a liberal bent, while just 32 percent had a conservative tilt.

Finally, said the report, "Another difference between the networks' treatment of the Democrats in 2007 and this year's crop of Republican candidates—the tone of the questioning is far more adversarial this year. The Democratic front-runners four years ago were indulged with friendly questions aimed at creating a personal bond with voters."

For example, said the center, "In May 2007, NBC sent Meredith Vieira to New Hampshire to follow Barack Obama around for the day. 'Do you have a weakness on the campaign trail, anything that you have to have with you at all times? Stuffed animal?' (Obama answered that he liked 'a certain brand of green tea.') Vieira kept up the softballs: 'When your head hits the pillow tonight in Iowa, will you fall fast asleep, or will your mind be racing about the next day?...Do you dream of the White House?'"

[Book: Liberal bias distorts news media.]

The GOP candidates this time out haven't seen those kind of softballs. According to the group, "the questioning has been strictly business-like, and occasionally caustic. NBC's Matt Lauer asked Rick Santorum if it was fair to brand him an 'ultraconservative on social issues.' During Mike Huckabee's appearance on Good Morning America in February, George Stephanopoulos painted mainstream Republicans as a engaging in fringe behavior: 'It seems like Republican leaders have the hardest time in the world saying simply and clearly 'President Obama is a Christian and President Obama is a citizen. Get over it.'"

Corrected on 9/22/11: A previous version of this blog post misstated the percentage of liberally-biased questions Democrats received during the 2008 presidential election. It was 68 percent.



View the original article here



Peliculas Online