Farmer jailed in Hong Kong for burning flag

A man has been jailed in Hong Kong for burning the national flag, in the first sentence of its kind.

S Korea suspends savings banks citing weak finances

South Korea has suspended seven local savings banks citing the weak state of their finances.

Japan urges mass evacuation ahead of Typhoon Roke

More than a million people in central and western Japan have been urged to leave their homes as a powerful typhoon approaches.

Burma begins swap scheme for cars over 40 years old

Owners of some of Burma's most antiquated cars have been queuing in Rangoon to exchange their old vehicles for permits to import newer models.

Polio strain spreads to China from Pakistan

Polio has spread to China for the first time since 1999 after being imported from Pakistan, the World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed.

Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

New risk for Occupy Wall Street: less media interest

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Protesters and members of Occupy Wall Street wait for the start of the march, during an annual demonstration calling for a stop to police brutality in New York October 22, 2011. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

1 of 4. Protesters and members of Occupy Wall Street wait for the start of the march, during an annual demonstration calling for a stop to police brutality in New York October 22, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Eduardo Munoz

By Ben Berkowitz

NEW YORK | Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:04pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - "Occupy Wall Street" is occupying less space in TV broadcasts, newspapers and social media as the story settles into a familiar pattern and protesters dig in for what could be a protracted fight.

While the movement's reliance on Twitter and Facebook to spread its message is well established, it has also benefited from becoming a media curiosity, at times drawing legions of TV crews and reporters to its encampments. Coverage fed on itself, as more people joined in more cities.

But experts say the protests are now making a natural -- yet challenging -- progression off the front page and cable news, as new events like the death of Muammar Gaddafi take prominence.

Any loss of the limelight, especially when the onset of cold weather has already started to reduce the ranks of protesters prepared to camp out overnight in lower Manhattan, could dampen the momentum of the movement.

"Without the oxygen to fuel their fire they're very much at risk of losing relevance," said Daniel Tisch, chairman of the Global Alliance of Public Relations & Communication Management, a confederation of national PR societies.

To some extent, even the protesters agree they are likely to get less attention as time goes by.

"People know what the general storyline is," said Senia Barragan, a protester from New Jersey acting as a spokeswoman for the occupation when not working on a doctorate at Columbia University. "I think they're moving on to other stories."

The loss of media interest is the latest roadblock to Occupy's momentum.

Experts on social movements have said the protesters need a "second act" of sorts as fatigue sets in and as cold weather starts to descend on New York and other protest sites.

In the days leading up to a series of worldwide protests on October 15, there were practically as many reporters as occupiers at Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan -- to the consternation of some protesters, who started charging to have their pictures taken.

But with more than five weeks gone since the concrete plaza was first taken, the media's fascination with the story has started to wane.

DOWN SHARPLY LAST WEEK

The Pew Research Center produces a weekly News Coverage Index, which charts what percentage of total news coverage across dozens of outlets is taken up by a variety of topics. In the week ended October 16, coverage of Occupy Wall Street peaked at 10 percent of the total "newshole."

But last week it fell sharply to just 4 percent of news coverage, according to the latest version of the index, about the same as the mass release of exotic animals in Ohio.

Other data also support the finding. The Factiva news database shows 18,341 mentions of "Occupy Wall Street" in the week ended October 23, down 19 percent from the week prior.

While mentions rose daily during the week ended October 16, the numbers declined steadily the following week. From October 17 to 23, the number of daily uses of the phrase fell by more than half.

Even on those social media platforms that have been a backbone of the Occupy protests, there is less attention now.

Trendistic, a website that lets people monitor Twitter trends, shows clearly that the "#OccupyWallSt" hashtag has been declining as a percentage of overall hashtag use worldwide since October 15.

The same holds for other popular tags of the movement like "OWS" and simply "Occupy."

TV data is harder to come by, but anyone who has spent any time at Zuccotti Park over the last month can tell there are fewer TV operations than there were before. On Monday morning, there was just one satellite truck and a small handful of foreign camera crews.

Media watchers said all of these changes were to be expected in the context of what has been an extremely busy news year thus far.

"There's a lot of other things going on. This could just, instead of being front page news, be relegated ... further in the newspaper than the front page," said Brad Adgate, senior vice president of research at Horizon Media.

(Reporting by Ben Berkowitz; editing by Edward Tobin)



New Automobile



Education Information

Monday, October 24, 2011

Why Pakistan's media needs a code of conduct

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
23 October 2011 Last updated at 23:04 GMT Pakistani media film a bullet-riddled burning bus in Quetta on October 4, 2011. Pakistan's media feed on a daily diet of death and destruction Pakistan's media landscape has exploded over the last decade. But it is still the most dangerous place on earth to be a journalist and there are now calls for a strict code of conduct to protect the press and the public. Nosheen Abbas investigates the chaotic world of Pakistani journalism.

In 2008 a colleague of mine was reporting from the scene of a horrific bomb blast at a police station in a busy market place, Aapbara.

Television crews were there filming the carnage and as medical workers desperately worked to save lives, one cameraman tapped a medic on the shoulder and asked him to remove the victim from the ambulance so that he could film him putting the injured man inside the vehicle.

He had missed it the first time.

This kind of behaviour is not uncommon, says BBC Urdu correspondent Aijaz Maher.

It is one of the reasons why there are growing calls for a code of ethics for Pakistan's media where journalists are operating in an industry still finding its feet.

'Unhealthy' ratings war

In 1999, after Pervez Musharraf overthrew democratically-elected Nawaz Sharif in a coup, the president-general liberalised the awards of licences for private television channels.

There was a spate of new media groups but it wasn't long before Gen Musharraf began to keep the media on a short leash through censorship and fines on those who criticised the establishment.

An injured Pakistani policeman gestures to be left alone by the media - 2009 There are concerns about the intrusiveness of media when violence strikes

However, today the Pakistani media are strong, often seen as another pillar of Pakistani society.

But many agree that the hyperactivity of breaking, rolling news has meant objectivity taking a back seat.

"There's a war for ratings and the competition is unhealthy," Zaffar Abbas, editor of Dawn newspaper, says.

Even though parliamentarians proposed a code of conduct for the electronic media to control the graphic coverage of terror attacks, there are still major errors.

The gruesome picture of what many believed was the corpse of Osama Bin Laden was broadcast across Pakistani media - it turned out to be a fake.

More recently, an image of a bearded man wearing a substantial white turban and a brown blazer standing next to former US President Ronald Reagan was reprinted in many Pakistani dailies as an image of Reagan with the notorious Afghan militant Jalaluddin Haqqani.

But Haqqani has never visited the US. The picture, is in fact of an Afghan mujahideen commander called Younis Khalis.

And last year a number of Pakistani newspapers admitted they had been hoaxed after publishing reports based on fake Wikileaks cables containing anti-Indian propaganda.

Clearly the right questions were not asked at the critical moments before publication.

Spewing hatred

The discussion of a code of conduct has been in the works for a long time in Pakistan. In 2011 the government set up the Press Council and appointed a chairman and members.

Continue reading the main story
Sadly, although the independent media has been urged to develop its own guidelines it has shown little interest in doing so”

End Quote Farhanaz Ispahani, Presidential media adviser "This council will receive complaints against newspapers and television channels," says IA Rehman, head of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan.

Recently, prominent journalist Najam Sethi was targeted on a local television channel which excoriated him (and his daughter) for being anti-Pakistan and collaborating with the United States.

Mr Sethi's life is already under threat because of his outspoken and critical journalism. But a tirade from a high-profile TV host shows that media personalities with clout can be defamatory without being held accountable.

"Sadly, although the independent media has been urged to develop its own guidelines it has shown little interest in doing so. Commercial interests seem to outweigh social responsibility at the moment," says Farhanaz Ispahani, a member of Pakistan's National Assembly and media adviser to President Zardari.

But while the media scrambles for higher ratings and some journalists continue to spew hatred, the effectiveness of the Press Council is questionable.

Pakistani journalists shout slogans during a protest supporting media rights in Islamabad on August 23, 2011. Many Pakistani journalists feel they still face danger and have demanded greater rights and protection

Pakistan is a place where violence against women is commonplace. The coverage is instant but the treatment of the stories is like walking through a minefield.

One case in point is a girl who was gang-raped in Karachi last year. It was covered extensively, but some newspapers named the victim, giving her address and - to add insult to injury - a minister appeared on TV implying she had a "bad character".

The case of a female doctor allegedly raped by a military official in 2005 just disappeared from news stories. Former President Pervez Musharraf made a statement in defence of the accused before the investigation was even over.

Asma Jahangir, now the Supreme Court Bar president, called it a "cover-up". Pakistani authorities deny this, but there was no follow-up in the local media.

Dangerous climate

Those journalists who do end up investigating stories and implicate the state or invite the anger of religious groups are often allegedly intimidated by either official security forces or militant groups.

The most recent example is of Saleem Shehzad, a journalist for Asia Times, who wrote an article about al-Qaeda infiltration in Pakistan's navy and was found dead after he was allegedly abducted by Pakistani intelligence officials.

Human rights groups say more journalists have been killed in Pakistan than in any other country in recent years.

But another complication to this story is the feeling among a number of journalists and producers that some among them are "turncoats" who also work for intelligence agencies.

So within a chequered yet important industry, efforts to come up with an agreed set of media guidelines remain elusive.

A code of conduct may not make Pakistan a safer place for journalists - but it will begin the process of institutionalising professionalism in the industry.



Technology



News

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Obama's Turn to Bash the Media

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

A day after President Obama's anger at the media bubbled up at a televised press conference, his campaign today proudly touted their quarterly fundraising success while bashing the "media circus" that had suggested they'd fall short of their goals.

"Just six days before the last fundraising deadline, one major newspaper ran a story under the headline, 'Small donors are slow to return to the Obama fold,'" wrote Rufus Gifford, Obama's finance director. "You and a whole lot of other supporters turned that headline upside down," he wrote, adding, "Sometimes the media gets so caught up in its own echo chamber that the storyline separates from the facts."

Just Thursday, Obama put down Fox White House Correspondent Ed Henry who quoted Obama foe Mitt Romney in a question at a press conference. "I didn't know you were the spokesman for Mitt Romney," said Obama. [See political cartoons about President Obama.]

In his memo, printed in full below, Gifford also slammed the media and it's tendency to follow, like a pack of dogs, one story line even if it is thin.

"No matter what happens in the inside-the-beltway media circus, or what the pundits are predicting, we've got to stay focused on building this campaign from the ground up, one grassroots donation at a time. When each of us takes responsibility as a supporter, the combined impact sends a stronger message than any single newspaper story," he wrote. [Read: Obama Says Dinner Offer Is No Joke.]

Below is the Obama campaign's latest fundraising note.

Paul,

Just six days before the last fundraising deadline, one major newspaper ran a story under the headline "Small donors are slow to return to the Obama fold."

You and a whole lot of other supporters turned that headline upside down. Today we filed a report with the FEC that shows this movement isn't just as strong as ever—it's growing.

Sometimes the media gets so caught up in its own echo chamber that the storyline separates from the facts.

The great thing about building a grassroots organization based outside of Washington is that the press won't decide what happens here—you will.

In fact, right now, just shy of 1 million people like you have taken ownership of this campaign by pitching in whatever they can afford.

You can help us all get to that milestone today.

Another supporter is going to match whatever you're able to give right now. If you pitch in, you'll see who that person is, and where they're from. They may even leave a note for you.

Donate today and own a piece of this movement.

No matter what happens in the inside-the-beltway media circus, or what the pundits are predicting, we've got to stay focused on building this campaign from the ground up, one grassroots donation at a time.

When each of us takes responsibility as a supporter, the combined impact sends a stronger message than any single newspaper story.

You can do that right now.

Become one of the first million people giving, and your donation will be matched—doubling your impact:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Million-Match

Thanks,

Rufus

Rufus Gifford

National Finance Director

Obama for America



Home, Architecture and Furniture



Traveling Info

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Koch Brothers Get Conservative Media Support

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Home > Politics & Policy > Washington Whispers > Koch Brothers Get Conservative Media Support

September 29, 2011 Print

Koch Industries, the huge energy and paper goods company privately owned by Charles and David Koch, is bracing for more media criticism, which insiders attribute to the brothers' backing of the Tea Party and conservative and libertarian causes.

On the heels of a critical report on Bloomberg TV's Game Changers  show in June, firm insiders say that Bloomberg Markets Magazine is outlining an article the probes several old environmental and international controversies the company has been involved in. [Read: Team Obama Slams Koch Brothers for 'Mother of All Wars' Quote.]

One of those interviewed by Bloomberg for the upcoming article said the firm received four pages of single-spaced questions, all dealing with old trade and environmental problems and issues the company says it has fixed. None were about the firm's politics or the Koch brother's support for conservative causes, though the firm believes that is the focus.

While critical stories of Koch are nothing new, efforts by some in the conservative media and company supporters to launch a pre-emptive defense are unusual. Two conservative media outlets over the past two weeks reported that the firm is concerned that the Bloomberg story could be another slam at its right-leaning politics. [Check out political cartoons about the GOP.]

The Washington Examiner's editorial page editor Mark Tapscott recently reported that a friend of his, a former U.S. government official, was questioned about the Kochs' involvement with the Tea Party. "It looks like another hit piece against Charles and David Koch is coming," wrote Tapscott.

[See editorial cartoons about the Tea Party.]

The Daily Caller followed up with a similar story.

"We seem to be getting a lot of attention from journalists, maybe just because of the Kochs' political activities," said one insider.

Tags:media, republican party 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006:

Home, Architecture and Furniture



Traveling Info

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Israel dismisses deputy envoy to U.S. over media leak

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

JERUSALEM | Wed Oct 5, 2011 3:59am EDT

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel has dismissed its deputy ambassador in Washington over an alleged 2009 leak to the media about secret discussions involving the United States, diplomatic sources said on Wednesday.

They said that Dan Arbell, formerly the deputy director for North American affairs at Israel's Foreign Ministry, was removed after another senior diplomat implicated in the case was cleared by the security services.

Israel's bedrock alliance with the United States has been bolstered by common concern about Iran's nuclear program, yet cracks have appeared as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Barack Obama disagreed on how to pursue Israeli-Palestinian peace.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Ilana Stein said: "A senior official is being returned after his tenure was brought to an end." She described the move as unusual, but declined to elaborate on the circumstances or the identity of the official.

The previous suspect in the alleged leak, Alon Bar, served at the time as the Foreign Ministry's deputy director for strategic affairs, a role devoted largely to monitoring Iran. Following a suspension, he was appointed ambassador to Spain.

Israeli media published closed-door comments last year by Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to Washington, describing "a crisis of historic proportions" in bilateral ties after the Obama administration censured Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank.

Netanyahu has described such reports as overblown, noting Obama's public support for Israel's military build-up and, last month, its diplomatic campaign against a Palestinian bid to sidestep stalled peacemaking by appealing for U.N. membership.

Some Israeli diplomats have chafed at the reign of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, an ultranationalist partner in Netanyahu's conservative coalition government who has often clashed openly with the prime minister over core policymaking.

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Rosalind Russell)



Career Advisor



News

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Koch Brothers Get Conservative Media Support

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Home > Politics & Policy > Washington Whispers > Koch Brothers Get Conservative Media Support

September 29, 2011 Print

Koch Industries, the huge energy and paper goods company privately owned by Charles and David Koch, is bracing for more media criticism, which insiders attribute to the brothers' backing of the Tea Party and conservative and libertarian causes.

On the heels of a critical report on Bloomberg TV's Game Changers  show in June, firm insiders say that Bloomberg Markets Magazine is outlining an article the probes several old environmental and international controversies the company has been involved in. [Read: Team Obama Slams Koch Brothers for 'Mother of All Wars' Quote.]

One of those interviewed by Bloomberg for the upcoming article said the firm received four pages of single-spaced questions, all dealing with old trade and environmental problems and issues the company says it has fixed. None were about the firm's politics or the Koch brother's support for conservative causes, though the firm believes that is the focus.

While critical stories of Koch are nothing new, efforts by some in the conservative media and company supporters to launch a pre-emptive defense are unusual. Two conservative media outlets over the past two weeks reported that the firm is concerned that the Bloomberg story could be another slam at its right-leaning politics. [Check out political cartoons about the GOP.]

The Washington Examiner's editorial page editor Mark Tapscott recently reported that a friend of his, a former U.S. government official, was questioned about the Kochs' involvement with the Tea Party. "It looks like another hit piece against Charles and David Koch is coming," wrote Tapscott.

[See editorial cartoons about the Tea Party.]

The Daily Caller followed up with a similar story.

"We seem to be getting a lot of attention from journalists, maybe just because of the Kochs' political activities," said one insider.

Tags:media, republican party 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006:

View the original article here



Peliculas Online

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Bachmann, Romney Losing Media Battle to Perry

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Tea Partyers helped put Michele Bachmann on the national map, so tonight's CNN/Tea Party Republican presidential debate could be an excellent place for her to regain lost ground. Polls show that Bachmann has lost substantial support over the last month, while Texas Gov. Rick Perry's popularity has skyrocketed. At the same time, data also shows, Bachmann andformer Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney have lost ground to him in the mainstream media.

Data compiled by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism shows just how much Perry has taken over the national debate, at the expense of Bachmann and Romney. From the moment he announced his candidacy, Perry has received far more media attention than his fellow candidates. In a broad sample of news stories from print, broadcast, and online media studied by Pew, Bachmann and Romney have appeared nearly equally often as lead newsmakers in 2011 (through September 4), with 151 and 153 stories, respectively (in Pew's analysis, a "lead newsmaker" is a person present in 50 percent or more of a news story). Perry has received moderately less coverage, with 126 stories. However, Perry declared his candidacy on August 13, far later than Bachmann or Romney. Since his entry, he has been the lead newsmaker in 90 of Pew's stories, more than four times Romney's level of coverage (20 stories), and nearly seven times Bachmann's (13 stories).

See who Tim Pawlenty has endorsed in 2012

Media coverage of new presidential candidates tends to follow "an almost natural progression of events," says Mark Jurkowitz, associate director of Pew's journalism program. "The candidate explodes onto the scene, they essentially generate a significant amount of coverage if they show certain indices of viability," like successful fundraising and polling. "So the first thing the media tries to figure out if his person is a serious candidate or not, or has potential to be a serious candidate." After that, says Jurkowitz, "there kicks in another process, and that's the vetting process, particularly for candidates who aren't particularly well-known."

This process has played out differently for the biggest Republican candidates, and Bachmann's trajectory seems to have suffered the most during this process. Perry is still only one month into his candidacy and is only beginning to feel the in-depth scrutiny of media vetting. Romney, meanwhile, did not burst onto the scene in the way that Perry did, but as a 2008 top-tier Republican candidate also may not require the vetting that Perry will. "The press doesn't feel like it has to introduce Mitt Romney to the American public," says Jurkowitz.

Bachmann, however, was relatively well-known on a national scale prior to her presidential campaign, having made a name for herself as key Tea Party fixture and conservative firebrand. That image may have put her at a disadvantage in the current campaign. Much prior media coverage of Bachmann had focused on her propensity for making outrageous statements espousing what some consider to be extreme viewpoints. That preconstructed narrative, says Jurkowitz, is hard for the media to shake. "That would create the impression in many people, in many media quarters, that she's not going to be a likely successful presidential candidate, simply because of where she is in the ideological spectrum," he says.

Read about the economic battles that await Congress this fall.

And this is where the damaging circularity of media coverage and popularity comes in. "I think clearly the news media does have the effect of priming the attention that voters give to candidates," says Christopher Arterton, a professor of political management at The George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. "The press both follows and leads what's happening both in the polls and other indicators of candidate success."

In other words, to some extent, any publicity is good publicity. So Bachmann's key to regaining her footing with voters may be regaining her place in the spotlight. She does have a proven ability to attract the news media's attention, and with numerous economic battles awaiting on Capitol Hill this fall, Bachmann may have plenty of opportunities to make a media splash. For example, she seized on President Obama's jobs speech last week, as well as the lack of a formal Republican response, to hold a press conference at which she delivered her own reaction.



View the original article here



Peliculas Online

Monday, September 19, 2011

Russia media boss in TV punch-up

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
18 September 2011 Last updated at 14:16 GMT Russian billionaires come to blows
Russian media mogul Alexander Lebedev, who owns two UK newspapers, has punched a fellow guest off his seat during a televised economic debate in Moscow.
Mr Lebedev, owner of the Independent and Evening Standard, hit former real estate businessmen Sergei Polonsky with two right hooks, sending him off the back of the platform.
Mr Lebedev said Mr Polonsky had been aggressive throughout the debate, which is to be aired on NTV on Sunday.
"I neutralised him," Mr Lebedev said.
Ripped trousers
Just prior to the attack, Mr Polonsky told the other guests he wanted to "stick one in the mouth".
Mr Lebedev stands, turns to the audience and then sits back down, only to launch immediately into a two-punch attack that sends Mr Polonsky sprawling.
Mr Lebedev, who also co-owns the Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta with former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and is the largest private share holder in Aeroflot, used his blog to try to justify the assault.
"In a critical situation, there is no choice. I see no reason to be hit with the first shot. I neutralised him."
Mr Polonsky did not appear to be harmed but pictures posted later online appeared to show a cut arm and torn trousers.
The BBC's Steve Rosenberg in Moscow says Mr Polonsky is considering legal action.
But Mr Polonsky's complaint about ripped trousers drew short shrift from Mr Lebedev.
"Now he's showing his ripped pants, and it is hard to say anything about that. He was hit in the face and he's showing off a hole in the backside of his trousers. Strange," Mr Lebedev wrote.
Mr Polonsky headed the Mirax Group, worth $1.2bn in 2008, but it was hit hard by the financial crisis and had to stop construction.
He once said: "Those who don't have a billion can go to hell."