Farmer jailed in Hong Kong for burning flag

A man has been jailed in Hong Kong for burning the national flag, in the first sentence of its kind.

S Korea suspends savings banks citing weak finances

South Korea has suspended seven local savings banks citing the weak state of their finances.

Japan urges mass evacuation ahead of Typhoon Roke

More than a million people in central and western Japan have been urged to leave their homes as a powerful typhoon approaches.

Burma begins swap scheme for cars over 40 years old

Owners of some of Burma's most antiquated cars have been queuing in Rangoon to exchange their old vehicles for permits to import newer models.

Polio strain spreads to China from Pakistan

Polio has spread to China for the first time since 1999 after being imported from Pakistan, the World Health Organization (WHO) has confirmed.

Showing posts with label Should. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Should. Show all posts

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Russia: Iran-talks Group 5 + 1 should be held

A uranium enrichment facility in Isfahan, Iran. The processing facility is suspected in urania became part of secret nuclear weapons development program. (wikipedia.org)

Moscow (News and Us)-Russia Deputy Foreign Minister and a senior nuclear negotiator Sergei Ryabkov says, a new round of nuclear talks between Iran and the 5 + 1 Group should be held as soon as possible.

Ryabkov told reporters in Moscow, Tuesday, that progress has been achieved in the content of the talks recently, though not sufficient.


Ryabkov added that delaying the talks is a step that is not appropriate and there is no reason for it, reports IRNA.


Russia's senior nuclear negotiator also said there has been no agreement on the venue and date for a new round of talks and consultations-consultations with the two parties continues.


Iran has recently expressed its readiness for a new round of talks with Group 5 + 1.


Assistant to the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Ali Baqeri Iran declared Iran's readiness for talks, but added that the date for the upcoming talks with the 5 + 1 Group not specified.


He recommended that the group entered the talks constructive and clear.


IRNA reported that the last round of negotiations was held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on 5-6 April 2013.


Saeed Jalili led Iran delegation and Catherine Ashton led the team negotiating the Group 5 + 1.


Translator: Askan Krisna




News; Finance; Insurance; Health; Cancer




News; Finance; Insurance; Health; Cancer; Car Insurance; Health Insurance

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Should Joe Paterno Survive Penn State’s Child Sex Scandal?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Scott Audette / Reuters Penn State head coach Joe Paterno

If it’s all true — if any part of it is true, really – it’s difficult to imagine Joe Paterno surviving the unspeakable scandal unfolding at Penn State.

Name something worse to hit college sports, frequently a cesspool for hypocrites and cheaters. It’s not easy. On Saturday, the Pennsylvania attorney general’s office revealed all the disgusting allegations: Jerry Sandusky, a defensive coordinator at Penn State for 33 years who retired after the 1999 season, was charged with seven counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, four counts of unlawful contact with a minor, four counts of endangering the welfare of a child, and a host of other charges related to the sexual abuse of eight minors. If convicted, Sandusky, 67, could spend the rest of his life in prison.

Two Penn State administrators – athletic director Tim Curley, and senior vice president for finance and business Gary Schultz —  face perjury charges for allegedly lying about their knowledge of Sandusky’s behavior. They were also charged with failing to report the incident to the authorities, as required by Pennsylvania law. Curley and Schultz both denied the charges. Curley put himself on administrative leave, while Schultz has stepped down. Sandusky has also denied all charges. A preliminary hearing in the case is set for Wednesday.

(MORE: Penn State Child Abuse Chargers Lead to Two Resignations)

For good reason, attention has now turned to Paterno’s role in this whole mess. According to grand jury testimony, in 2002 a graduate assistant witnessed Sandusky, who in 1977 founded a charity for at-risk youth called Second Mile, subjecting a 10-year-old boy to anal intercourse in the shower of the Penn State football facility. (Here’s the grand jury report. Fair warning: it’s an awful document.)

The assistant (identified by the Harrisburg Patriot-News as current recruiting coordinator/wide receiver’s coach Mike McQueary) reported the incident to Paterno, but Paterno testified that the assistant left out the more graphic details. “It was obvious that the witness was distraught over what he saw, but he at no time related to me the very specific actions contained in the Grand Jury report,” Paterno said in a statement. “Regardless, it was clear that the witness saw something inappropriate involving Mr. Sandusky.” Paterno knew it was sexual in nature, according to the grand jury report.

Paterno then informed his boss, Curley, about the incident.  The prosecution did not charge Paterno with any crimes, and he will reportedly testify for the prosecution at Sandusky’s trial. “I did what I was supposed to with the one charge brought to my attention,” Paterno said.

Paterno may have met his legal obligation. But if the charges against Sandusky hold up, he failed his moral obligation miserably. Penn State’s football motto is “Success With Honor.” College football coaches at large, state-run institutions are more influential than many governors. And few are as revered as Paterno, who on Oct. 29 won the 409th game of his 46-year career, a Division I record.

So Paterno, the biggest man on campus, can’t just punt this problem to a university bureaucrat and wash his hands of it. He should have followed up with Curley, and made sure he reported the allegations to the authorities, and let the criminal investigation run its course. If Curley wasn’t going to do it, Paterno should have done it himself.

MORE: The Nittany Lion King



Debt Financing



Health Management

Friday, October 14, 2011

Obama Should Be Wary of 'Occupy' Movement

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Home > Politics & Policy > Washington Whispers > Obama Should Be Wary of 'Occupy' Movement

October 14, 2011 Print

Pollster John Zogby updates our weekly Obama Report Card with a grade on the president's performance. Zogby uses his polling, expert analysis and interaction with major players to come up with a grade and some comments that capture how he sees the president's week ending.

John Zogby on Week: 143

"A Senate majority supported the president's jobs bill, with every Republican opposed. Obama is counting on the bill staying popular and using it to hammer Republicans. Unfortunately for him, two Democrats up for election next year voted no, allowing the GOP to say opposition was bipartisan. People on the streets in the growing Occupy Wall Street (and other cities) are sick of the gamesmanship by both parties. Obama is keeping the movement at arm's length, and should realize it is in part a repudiation of him, and that he can't count on these angry voters' support a year from now. The week's best news for Obama may have come from big business leaders who hold nearly all the seats on his Jobs Council. The council's interim report is very similar to Obama's own jobs plan. Maybe Obama has more business friends in high places than people think."

This week's grade: C-

Last week's: C

John Zogby is Chairman of the Board and Chief Insights Officer for IBOPE Zogby International, a non-partisan public opinion, research, and business solutions firm with experience working in more than 70 countries around the globe. IBOPE Zogby International specializes in telephone, Internet, and face-to-face survey research and analysis for corporate, political, nonprofit, and governmental clients. The firm is headquartered in Utica, N.Y. John Zogby is also the author of The Way We'll Be: The Zogby Report on the Transformation of the American Dream (Random House).

Tags:John Zogby, Barack Obama 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006:

Home, Architecture and Furniture



Traveling Info

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Why America Should Pay Attention to Egypt's Elections

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Anyone frustrated with the current state of American politics should look to recent electoral troubles in Egypt for some comparison. The Egyptian people—represented by potentially more than a hundred political parties—hope to participate in the country's first legitimate, democratic elections in decades, an endeavor proving to be increasingly contentious in the aftermath of the nation's historic revolution.

While Egypt's presidential elections won't take place until at least next year, the country's parliamentary elections are scheduled to start on November 28. Both in process and outcome, those elections will be vital for Egypt's future. Not only will they decide who's in charge of drafting a new constitution following the fall of a longtime ruler, former President Hosni Mubarek; the elections will also weigh heavily on the future of U.S. relations with Egypt, which has been an important strategic ally in the Middle East region.

[See political cartoons on the Middle East uprisings.]

"Egypt is a country that matters significantly. It has a disproportionate impact on the future of the broader Middle East, so we certainly have an interest in having Egypt as an ally of the United States and continuing to have that relationship," says Ohio Republican Rep. Steve Chabot, chairman of the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia. "The outcome of the election is important, and we should look at it very closely."

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta visited Egypt on Tuesday, the latest outreach from top U.S. administration officials to Egypt's current military rulers, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces or SCAF, which will oversee the elections before presumably handing control back to civilians. While careful to stay out of the politics, the Obama administration has been vocal with Egypt's military leaders in promoting free, transparent, and fair elections, which experts say is the first step in preserving American interests in the region. Though beyond messaging, American policymakers are also looking ahead to determine how they can retain influence in Egypt if—and likely when—certain groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist organization, gain power.

The $1.3 billion in foreign military aid is perhaps the strongest card that the United States can play in guiding a sound electoral process. Several members of Congress have proposed withholding aid should the upcoming elections not meet certain standards of transparency. The Senate's State Department appropriations bill for 2012, which passed through committee last month, for example, includes a contingency that "funds further the national interests of both countries," and that the Egyptian government holds "free and fair elections" and implements "policies to protect due process and freedoms of expression and association.""The Egyptian people have made themselves clear, and Egypt's military leaders have agreed, about the need for Democratic elections and other basic freedoms," said Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, who chairs the subcommittee responsible for the bill, in a statement. "Going forward, the days of blank checks are over, and it is in the mutual interest of the Egyptian people and the United States to reinforce these rights as conditions for our aid."

The Obama administration, however, has vowed to try to convince Congress to protect Egypt's aid. Last week, after meeting with Egypt's foreign minister, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton emphasized the administration's commitment. "We are against conditionality," she said. "We believe that the long-standing relationship between the United States and Egypt is of paramount importance to both of us. We support the democratic transition, and we don't want to do anything that in any way draws into question our relationship or our support."

[See photos of the Obamas abroad.]

Americans and other nations have put pressure on Egypt's military to allow international monitoring of the elections. According to the latest agreement between political parties and the military, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, foreign entities will be allowed to "view and follow" the elections, but the more involved election "monitoring" will still be prohibited to protect Egypt's sovereignty.



Home, Architecture and Furniture



Traveling Info

Friday, September 30, 2011

Should killers on death row get a last meal choice?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
26 September 2011 Last updated at 12:05 GMT By Daniel Nasaw BBC News Magazine, Washington Death chamber photo courtesy of Getty, Hamburger photo courtesy of Reuters The state of Texas has ended the practice of offering death row inmates their choice of last meal before their deaths. What does a killer's choice of food say about his state of mind?

Lawrence Brewer's last request was so extravagant it seemed a mockery.

Just before the acknowledged white supremacist was put to death by lethal injection on Wednesday, he ordered two steaks, a triple-meat cheeseburger, a cheese omelette, a large bowl of fried okra, three fajitas, a pint of ice cream and a pound (0.45kg) of barbecue meat.

It's not clear how much of that he was actually served, or whether his nerves affected his appetite, but he ate none of it.

The following day, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice heeded the request from an outraged Texas state senator to end the tradition of the generous last meal.

Continue reading the main story image of Carroll Pickett Carroll Pickett Texas "death house" chaplain, 1982 -1995

I was there for 95 who ate their last meal and died. I was with them when they got there in the morning, I stayed with them all day.

We provided for them whatever they asked for, if it was on the unit. We didn't go out and buy Whataburgers, we didn't go out and buy Mexican food, but if it was on the unit and it could be fixed by the stewards, we gave it to them. If they wanted Dr Pepper I could go next door and get them one.

A lot of them would decline.

They would just say, 'I just don't feel like it', or they would say, 'I'm getting nervous, I'm getting scared'. Very few - I'd say less then 10% - ate all that we brought to them.

Those who had spiritual reasons, they would say 'Jesus didn't get a last meal on the day he was executed'.

When the sun went down after 17:00, they know this is their last sunset, then their whole attitude changes.

From then on, from after the shower and after the meal time, it's a whole different person.

From now on, condemned men in Texas will be offered the same cafeteria chow as other prisoners.

What men and women request for their last meal reflects how they lived their lives and how they choose to face their deaths, and offers Americans a poignant human connection to the people they have decided should die for their crimes, scholars and legal analysts say.

And as a ritual, the last meal is intended not to comfort the condemned but to soften for society the harsh fact that a human is about to be killed with the law's full sanction, says Jon Sheldon, a Virginia death penalty lawyer.

He has sat with three condemned men in the hours before their executions, including infamous Washington sniper John Allen Muhammad.

"I don't know anybody who has eaten the last meal," Mr Sheldon says.

"In my experience, it is unlikely that someone is going to be hungry and is going to want a meal. It's either not ordered, or it's ordered and it's not eaten."

Florida, which has executed 69 convicts since 1976, budgets $40 (£26) per inmate, and the last meal must be purchased locally.

Take-away meals

Oklahoma - 176 men and three women executed since 1915 - is more miserly, giving prisoners only $15 to spend on a last meal, subject to the warden's approval.

Lawrence Russell Brewer during his trial in 1999 Brewer was executed for the murder of an African-American man dragged to death behind a truck

The meal has to be purchased from a restaurant within the town of McAlester, home to the death chamber, says Jerry Massie, a spokesman for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections.

"The staff doesn't prepare it," he said.

The last man executed there ordered a deep dish meat lover's pizza from Pizza Hut, and deep fried shrimp with cocktail sauce and hushpuppies - fried cornmeal balls - from fast food outlet Long John Silver's, Mr Massie says.

The man before him had a large pepperoni and Italian sausage pizza and a large Dr Pepper soda.

Continue reading the main story John Wheat, 13 June 2001: Liver and onions, mashed potatoes and gravy, whole milkJack Clark, 9 January, 2001: Jar of Polish pickles, wedge of cheese, tossed salad with Italian dressing, cheeseburger, French fries with ketchup, grape juiceOliver Cruz, 9 August 2000: Spicy beef fajitas, beans, rice, flour tortillas, onions, tomatoes, avocado, banana split, orange juiceGlen McGinnis, 25 January 2000: Cheeseburger with lettuce, tomato, bacon, onion rings, and ketchupClydell Coleman, 5 May 1999: Salmon croquettes, scrambled eggs, French fries and biscuitsJonathan Nobles, 7 October 1998: "Eucharist - sacrament"Danny Harris, 30 July 1993: "God's saving grace, love, truth, peace and freedom"

Source: Texas Department of Criminal Justice

A review of last meal requests in Texas between 1982 and 2003 shows the most popular requests were grilled or fried foods like burgers, fried chicken or steaks.

This suggests the condemned had sought a last sensual reminder of home before they died, says Phoebe Ellsworth, a professor of law and psychology at the University of Michigan.

"Most of the offenders come from fairly poor backgrounds," says Prof Ellsworth, who has researched capital punishment extensively.

"It's a memory of something about life on the outside. 'When we went out to have a good time, what did we have?'"

A significant number of inmates forgo the last meal, whether in defiance of the ritual or for lack of appetite. Or for spiritual reasons: David Clark, executed in Texas in 1992 at age 32 for a double murder, told prison officials he wanted to fast.

"They have other things on their minds," Mr Sheldon says. "Inmates have gotten tired of co-operating with these rituals of death."

Alcohol is prohibited, and requests for cigarettes and bubble gum have been turned down.

'Christian connotation'

The ritual of the last meal captures the public imagination because the activity of sitting down for dinner is one Americans with no experience of prison life can relate to, says Deborah Denno, a professor at Fordham University School of Law in New York and an expert on capital punishment law.

Troy Davis Troy Davis, executed on Wednesday in Georgia, declined a last meal

"It brings us back to the fact that this is a human being who will not be having any more dinners like we do," she says.

"There's a drama associated with it. This is the Last Supper. Maybe it has that Christian connotation."

In Texas, the state that has executed the most people in the country since modern capital punishment resumed in 1976, with 475, State Senator John Whitmire says his push to end the last meal tradition was made of moral concerns, not financial ones.

And he vehemently disagrees with critics who say it is petty and mean-spirited to withhold from the condemned one last creature comfort.

"If you're fixing to execute someone under the laws of the state because of the hideous crime that someone has committed, I'm not looking to comfort him," he says.

"He didn't give his victim any comfort or a choice of last meal," he says of Brewer.

Rather than reform the last meal, Texas officials should worry about the justice, efficacy and constitutionality of capital punishment there, says Richard Dieter, executive director of research organisation Death Penalty Information Center.

"They take it away, hopefully they're looking to what they should be providing. A last lawyer rather than a last meal is much more important."



View the original article here



Peliculas Online

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Netflix Split: Should We Blame Canada?

File photo of DVD rental and screen shot of Netflix website REUTERS/Brian Snyder/Files


It's a hassle to have to deal with two separate companies, meaning double ratings, double queues, and most begrudgingly, double bills. Why not make the grieving process easy by just blaming our northern neighbors?
Canadians: they're lovely people. Seriously. And we bet they'd offer a hearty and sincere “Sooorry.” But according to Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, we should blame them for the split between Netflix and the new DVD-by-mail service called Qwikster.
(LIST: Top 10 Worst Corporate Name Changes)
“It's all the Canadians' fault,” Hastings joked Thursday as he answered questions about the fracturing company while celebrating Netflix's first anniversary of its Canadian launch. The Great White North got its first taste of Netflix last September, as a streaming-only endeavor.
“Is broadband good enough that streaming only, without DVD, is a good enough product to catch on?” Hastings wondered. Turns out, it certainly was. Good enough to become its own business, apparently.
The DVD-by-mail service, not even available in Canada, became unbundled from the streaming service in July. And this week Netflix announced the postal program would become a separate company, now (laughably) known as Qwikster. We've never seen a better definition of “going postal.” The Netflix stock has tumbled more than 30 points this week in reaction to the name change.